|
Stormwater Manual
Back to
Engineering
Back to
Special Planning Regulations
Printer
Friendly View
CITY
OF GEORGETOWN
ORDINANCE NO. 2002-______
AN ORDINANCE RELATED TO THE
AMENDMENT
OF THE GEORGETOWN/SCOTT COUNTY SUBDIVISION & DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS
REGARDING ARTICLE XI – STORM WATER MANAGEMENT
WHEREAS: The existing Subdivision
& Development Regulations requirements are not satisfying the community’s
needs. The regulation requirements must be updated to reflect the current
professional thinking, engineering principles and best management practices to
address storm water management. Scott County boasts some of the most prestigious
streams in Kentucky. North Elkhorn, South Elkhorn and Eagle Creeks are used
extensively for fishing and recreation. In addition to these streams, Georgetown
and Scott County obtains the majority of its water from the Royal Spring
Aquifer, a natural resource unique in Kentucky, which is fed by groundwater
recharge. It is important to safeguard these waterways from pollutants and
changes in their ecology.
The Storm Water Manual is only one part of the
overall storm water plan. The manual, once adopted, will become an integral part
of the City of Georgetown’s Phase II permit. The City has contracted with an
outside firm for mapping and location of all drainage features within the
urbanized area. This work and the required permit must be filed with the
Kentucky Division of Water by March 2003.
All new developments, including those that
require substantial renovations or expansions, within the urbanized area will be
required to adhere to the new manual. Every time that a piece of land is
developed, certain and expected changes occur. Changes potentially in the amount
of groundwater recharge and even surface run-off can be impacted. The new
regulations hope to reduce and offset those issues. Anytime silt and
construction debris are allowed to leave a construction site, the effectiveness
of constructed drainage systems, including catch basins, drain pipes, swales and
easements, is reduced.
The intent of this proposed ordinance is to
provide an appropriate means to maintain the integrity and durability of
existing and proposed storm water systems within our neighborhoods and the City
of Georgetown;
WHEREAS: This proposed amendment to the
Georgetown-Scott County Subdivision & Development Regulations has been
submitted to the citizens through a properly advertised public hearing before
the Georgetown-Scott County Planning and Zoning Commission conducted at their
August 8, 2002, and September 12, 2002, public meeting. The Commission voted
unanimously to recommend the adoption of this amendment to the City Council of
Georgetown;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE COUNCIL
FOR THE CITY OF GEORGETOWN, KENTUCKY, as follows:
SECTION ONE: NEW PROVISIONS.
[New language is underlined. Language which is unchanged is not
marked. Superseded language is shown as stricken.]
- THE SUBDIVISION & DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS,
ARTICLE XI, SECTION 1105, is amended to include:
A.
1-6 unchanged
B. 1-6
unchanged
7. for all detention basins and inflow
and outflow structures: storm
water facilities and inflow and outflow structures must be evaluated to include,
if warranted, the following:
a. unchanged
b. design
hydrographs of inflow and outflow fo the 25-year, 24-hour or 10-year one
hour events for the site under existing and developed conditions;
c. demonstration
that the floor of the basin will be constructed and compacted to provide at
least a 2% minimum slope to the outlet pipe to ensure that detained waters
fully drain and do not create a health and safety hazard or visual nuisance.
d.
Demonstration
that overflow for a storm in excess of the design capacity will be provided
and designed to function without specific attention as part of the excess
stormwater passage.
b.
provide anti-seep collars details for storm water impoundment facilities
that have dewatering times greater than 48 hours, or permanent pools.
c. dewatering features, such as valve structures and/or underlying
drain systems, are to be included for facilities other than standard
detention designs, for example, permanent pools, constructed wetlands,
infiltration basins, bioretention areas, etc.
d. water budget analyses are to be done for all storm water facilities
with permanent pools.
e. outlet pipes for all storm water impoundments are to be reinforced
concrete pipes.
f. construction plans are to include all compaction requirements and
tolerances for all proposed water impoundments, dams, and channel/stream
crossings.
g. provide a means of access to all proposed storm water facilities.
8. storm water impoundment facilities are to
serve as temporary sediment basins until the contributing drainage area
exceeds 90 percent build out. At that time, they shall be converted over to
the approved post developed storm water facility.
C. Storm water manual (note all of the
following language is new and to be added)
1. Requirements:
Developments that occur within Scott County are required to provide the
Planning Commission a Storm Water Management Plan that addresses all
the elements of the hydrologic cycle. These elements include, and are not
limited to, the following:
a) Groundwater recharge
b) Water quality protection
c) Channel protection
d) Water quantity control
The plan is to include construction drawings
showing all details on how to construct the proposed improvements and a drainage
report providing all necessary calculations to comply with each element. All
storm water management plans are to be reviewed and approved by the Planning
Commission Engineer. The Georgetown City Engineer must also approve plans for
developments that are within the Georgetown City Limits.
Construction Plans:
All Storm Water Management Plans shall provide details related to all
aspects of the construction. Developments are to be designed to ensure that
controls are in place that would prevent or minimize water quality impacts.
Designers are to develop and implement strategies, which include a combination
of structural and/or non-structural Best Management Practices (BMPs) appropriate
for the community. The plans must also ensure adequate long-term operation and
maintenance of BMPs through notes or labels on construction drawings, Final
Subdivision Plats, and Final Development Plans.
Drainage Reports:
Studies are required to provide calculations supporting the use of the BMPs
specified in the plans. These studies are to be submitted in conjunction with
the Construction Plans for proposed developments. The following is a list of
minimum criteria to be included in all drainage reports:
- Summary tables outlining all hydrologic
quantities needed to support the storm water management plans.
- Soil survey maps showing the existing soil
conditions for a proposed development.
- Ponding elevations for each of the proposed
storm water structures, storm water facilities, and closed contour areas.
- Flow depths for all open channel conditions
that are a part of the proposed plans.
- Identification of all the swales, diversion
ditches, roadway ditches, 100 year drainage ways, and floodplains.
- Evaluation of storm water systems that
receive runoff from proposed developments; systems being defined as any
type of structure or open channel that conveys runoff.
- Pre and postdeveloped watershed maps showing
all parameters used by designers to produce their storm water plans.
- Maps that show all subcatchments draining to
each proposed structure.
- Label the analysis points where the study
terminates. All points of analysis are to be set to evaluate the potential
of compounding peak flow conditions downstream of developments. Analysis
points are to be approved by the Planning Commission Engineer.
Additional Requirements:
All
developments must also incorporate the following criteria into their designs:
- Finish floor elevations for proposed single
family and multifamily residential units are to be at least two feet above the
100-year water surface elevations of all waterways, overflow conditions,
overland flow areas, and ponding areas.
- Commercial facilities are to be evaluated for
protection from 100 year flooding conditions.
- Designs are not to include any fill to be placed
in 100 year drainage ways and floodplains, unless proposed construction
complies with Article XII, Section 1200 of the Subdivision and Development
Regulations, and any and all permits from the Federal, State, and Local
agencies are obtained prior to construction.
- Other than what is described in item #3, any and
all permits required by Federal, State, and Local agencies for developments
must be obtained prior to the commencement of that process regulated by the
permits.
A. Groundwater Recharge:
Base flows of local streams and waterways are fed by groundwater sources.
Developments can cause changes in the amount of water that would be used to
support base flows. As the impervious area of a site increases, so does the
volume of runoff. To maintain adequate base flows and stream ecosystems,
developments must incorporate practices in their storm water management plan to
provide for treated groundwater recharge. The amount of recharge that a site is
capable of providing depends on topographic factors such as slope, types of
vegetation, hydrological soil groups, and locations of rock layers. The average
annual recharge volume for a site can be estimated by taking the average annual
recharge rate of the hydrological soil group(s), dividing that by the average
annual rainfall (44.05 inches), and then multiplying that result by 90 percent.
The following table provides a summary of the recharge requirements:
|
Hydrologic Soil
Group (HSG) |
Average Annual Recharge
Volume
in/yr |
Soil Specific
Recharge (Sin)
in |
|
A |
18 |
0.37 |
|
B |
12 |
0.25 |
|
C |
6 |
0.12 |
|
D |
3 |
0.06 |
Scott County Soils
|
Soil Series |
NRCS HSG |
Depth to Bedrock
ft |
Seasonal High Water Table
ft |
Permeability
in/hr |
Suitability as Road Fill |
|
Ashton |
B |
>4 |
>5 |
0.6-2.0 |
Fair |
|
Cynthiana |
D |
1-1.5 |
>5 |
0.6-2.0
0.2-0.6 |
Poor |
|
Dunning(1) |
D |
>3.5 |
0-0.5 |
0.6-2.0
<0.2 |
Poor |
|
Eden |
C |
1.5-3.5 |
>5 |
0.2-0.6
<0.2 |
Poor |
|
Faywood |
C |
1.5-3.5 |
>3.5 |
0.6-2.0
2.0-6.0 |
Poor |
|
Huntington(1) |
B |
>4 |
>3 |
0.6-2.0 |
Fair |
|
Lowell |
C |
>3.5 |
>5 |
0.6-2.0
0.2-0.6 |
Poor |
|
Maury |
B |
>5 |
>5 |
0.6-6.0
0.6-2.0 |
Fair, Poor |
|
McAfee |
C |
1.5-3.5 |
>3.5 |
0.6-2.0
0.2-0.6 |
Poor |
|
Newark(1) |
C,D |
>4 |
0.5-1.5 |
0.6-2.0 |
Fair, Poor |
|
Nicholson |
C |
>5 |
1.5-2.5 |
0.6-2.0
<0.2 |
Poor |
|
Nolin(1) |
B |
4 |
3 |
0.6-2.0 |
Fair |
|
Disturbed Soil |
D
|
-
|
- |
- |
- |
Note: S(in) = (S)(P).
(1): Subject to common flooding.
References:
2000 Maryland Stormwater Design Manual Volumes I & II.
Soil Survey of Scott County, Kentucky.
Urban Hydrology for Small Watersheds, TR-55.
LFUCG Stormwater Manual, 1999.
The soil specific recharge is determined by
calculating a volume to be treated and infiltrated by a structural practice or
by a percent area method involving a non-structural practice. The following
formula is to be used for a structural practice:

GRV = Groundwater recharge volume,
acre-ft.
Sin = Soil specific recharge, in.
I = Percent impervious, %.
A = Total area of site, acre.
Examples of structural practices that can be used
for groundwater recharge are bioretention areas, infiltration facilities,
terraformed berms, and infiltration swales.
Since Scott County is in a karst region,
designers that intend to use structural practices for groundwater recharge must
evaluate potential areas to ensure that these proposed facilities would be
adequate and not have an adverse impact on surrounding areas, such as increasing
the water table. Designers are to ensure that the groundwater recharge volume is
to exit proposed facilities through natural infiltration or a designed outlet,
and that the volume is treated by BMPs prior to infiltration. Dewatering times
for structural practices should not exceed 48 hours. Groundwater recharge
requirements may be waived for redevelopments only if approved by the Planning
Commission Engineer.
B. Water Quality Protection:
The water chemistry of runoff is extremely important to the health of creeks and
streams. When enough rainfall occurs, runoff from land areas is transported from
these sites to drainage ways. These drainage ways eventually reach the creek
systems of Scott County. Depending on the types of sites, pollutants are
transported by the force of the runoff or by its physical factors such as
temperature and pH level. Water quality BMPs are to be used to the maximum
extent practical to minimize these impacts and to treat runoff from all proposed
impervious surfaces.
For adequate treatment, 90 percent of the average
annual rainfall must be treated by stormwater BMPs. Rainfall records from GMWSS
water treatment plant shows that approximately 90 percent of total storm events
occurred with 1 inch of rainfall or less.

The following equation is used to determine the
water quality volume needed to be treated for a development:

WQV = Water quality volume, acre-ft.
P = 90 percent of total storm events, 1 inch.
I = Percent impervious, %.
A = Total area of site, acre.
The following table(1) lists the
amounts of impervious areas that can expected from different types of
development, and the water quality depth in inches per given area:
|
Land Use/Cover Type |
Average Impervious Cover
% |
Water Quality Depth
Inches |
|
Paved parking lots(2) |
100 |
0.95 |
|
Roofs |
100 |
0.95 |
|
Driveways |
100 |
0.95 |
|
Streets and roads(2) |
100 |
0.95 |
|
Commercial and business districts |
85 |
0.82 |
|
Industrial |
72 |
0.70 |
|
Town houses |
65 |
0.64 |
|
Residential ⅛ acre lots or less |
65 |
0.64 |
|
Residential ¼ acre lots |
38 |
0.39 |
|
Residential ⅓ acre lots |
30 |
0.32 |
|
Residential ½ acre lots |
25 |
0.28 |
|
Residential 1 acre lots |
20 |
0.23 |
|
Residential 2 acre lots |
12 |
0.23 |
(1): Based on NRCS TR-55 modeling criteria.
(2): Excluding right-of-way.
Note: Water quality volume must be accounted for by storm water credits and/or
BMPs.
Targeted Pollutants:
Designers are to use structural and non-structural BMPs to the maximum extent
practical to treat the water quality volume. Individual treatments, or a
combination of BMPs, can be used to achieve this goal.
Different land uses can generate different types
of runoff pollutants. For instance, a proposed refueling station would produce a
higher concentration of hydrocarbons per acre than a proposed residential
subdivision. Selection of BMPs should be based on the anticipated pollutants for
a site. Some examples of typical pollutants for different applications are:
1. Residential
- Setteable solids
- Total suspended solids
- Nitrogen
- Phosphorous
- Metals
2. Commercial and industrial
- Hydrocarbons
- Trash
- Setteable solids
- Total suspended solids
- Nitrogen
- Phosphorous
- Metals
Additional Storm Water Controls for Specific
Commercial Areas: Specific design
criteria for the following types of development are to be used:
1. Restaurants/grocery stores
- Dumpster pad areas are to drain into the
proposed storm sewer system.
- A pretreatment device is to be used at
dumpster locations that drain into the storm sewer system.
- Pretreatment device is only to receive
surface water from dumpster pad.
- Configuration and pretreatment to be
approved by Scott County Health Department.
- Operation and maintenance criteria to be
included in the Construction Plans and Final Development Plans.
2. Refueling stations
- Canopy refueling areas are to drain to the
sanitary sewer.
- Grade elevations are set to ensure that the
only surface area draining into the sanitary system is from the pad
itself.
- No external rainwater can drain into the
sanitary lines.
- A pretreatment device is to be used for
discharges draining into the sanitary system.
- Configuration and pretreatment to be
approved by GMWSS.
- Operation and maintenance criteria to be
included in the Construction Plans and Final Development Plans.
3. Repair shops/oil change facilities/car lots
- Interior vehicle areas are to drain into the
sanitary system.
- A pretreatment device is to be used for
discharges draining into the sanitary system.
- Configuration and pretreatment to be
approved by GMWSS.
- Operation and maintenance criteria to be
included in the construction drawings and Final Development Plans.
4. Automotive and truck wash facilities
- Covered wash bays are to drain into the
sanitary sewer system.
- Grade elevations set to ensure that the only
surface areas draining into the sanitary system is from the bays
themselves.
- No external rainwater can drain into the
sanitary lines.
- A pretreatment device is to be used for
discharges draining into the sanitary system.
- Configuration and pretreatment to be
approved by GMWSS.
- Operation and maintenance criteria to be
included in the construction drawings and Final Development Plans.
Treated groundwater recharge volumes can count
towards the required water quality volumes; however, neither the groundwater
recharge or water quality volumes are to be included in the channel protection
and the water quantity control portion of the regulations.
C. Channel Protection:
Developments that require impervious areas and compacted fills reduce the
amount of rainfall that previously infiltrated into the underlying soils. The
rainfall is then converted into runoff, which eventually drains into the Scott
County creek systems. Frequent rainfall events help to shape stream
geometries. Uncontrolled events after development can cause degradation to
channel areas. To protect channels from this degradation, developments are to
provide extended detention for the 1 year/ 24 hour event, and allow the runoff
produced to dewater over a 12 hour period. Storm water facilities designed for
this condition will release flow at a rate not to exceed erosive flow rates in
downstream channels. Channel protection may be waived but not limited to
proposed sites that have less than 2 cfs for the post developed state.
Designers are encouraged to protect channel and
stream areas by not designing developments that require fill in headwater
stream channels, to within 50 feet of the bankfull conditions (1.5 to 2 year
return periods) of minor waterways, and floodplains. Developments that utilize
this option may qualify for density credits or other considerations similar to
a Planned Urban Development (PUD).
Channel and stream areas that are disturbed due
to grading and/or other construction activities must be stabilized and comply
with Article XII, Section 1200 of the Subdivision and Development
Regulations.
References: 2000 Maryland Stormwater Design
Manual Volumes I & II. Center
for Watershed Protection.
D. Water Quantity Control:
Typically with development, the volume of runoff increases due to the addition
of impervious areas, the compaction of soil materials, and removal of
vegetative cover. Some rainfall that once percolated into the ground would now
travel over the surface. Developments must provide stormwater features that
reduce the peak flow rates after development to what the runoff rates were
prior to construction. In addition to the 1 year channel protection
requirement, storm events that need to be adhered to are the 10, 25, and 100
year/ 24 hour events. Rainfall intensities for those events are to be taken
from Division of Water Engineering Memorandum No. 2, current edition or most
recent version. In the past, there have been storms that exceeded these design
storm events. Designers are encouraged to analyze proposed developments with
such rainfall intensities, if they feel that it is necessary for safe guarding
any proposed infrastructure.
Storm Sewer Design:
Proposed storm sewers systems that have the potential of being maintained by
any municipality or government utility in Scott County must adhere to the
following guidelines:
- All proposed storm lines are to be
reinforced concrete pipe (RCP), ADS-N12 or high density polyethylene
equivalent, A-2000, or aluminized type II corrugated metal pipe (CMP) with
bituminous coating. Please note that CMP can only be used when a designer
calls for a 48 inch line or greater in an urbanized area with the approval
of the Planning Commission Engineer and City Engineer. CMP is not
permitted in rural areas.
- Minimum pipe diameter for proposed lines is
12 inches.
- The maximum length between any storm sewer
structures, serving less than a 48 inch line, is 300 feet.
- Bedding details and joint specifications are
to be provided with all construction drawings and shall comply with
manufacturing recommendations.
- A storm sewer structure must be used if a
proposed storm line extends beyond the maximum length, is altered in
horizontal or vertical alignment, or changes in pipe material. Structures
are also to be used at the beginning and ending points for proposed storm
lines.
- Proposed systems are to be designed to
handle the 10 year/ 24 hour event capacity with no flow above crown of
pipe. Flow interception for structures must be based on bypass conditions.
No proposed system is to surcharge in the 100 year/ 24 hour event.
- Designers are to design storm sewers that
prevent the 100 year/ 24 hour runoff from crossing roadway crowns for
local and continuous streets. For collectors and arterials, runoff spread
and ponding are restricted to 6 feet from the face of curb in the 10 year/
24 hour event.
- 100 year/ 24 hour water surface elevations
are to be determined for all proposed storm sewer structures, such as
headwalls and surface inlets.
- In residential subdivisions that include
curb and gutter as part of their roadway design, proposed storm lines are
to be daylighted at the rear of proposed lots.
- Overflow swales are to be provided at sag
locations in commercial and residential subdivisions.
- The Planning Commission Engineer and Public
Works Department or equivalent must approve the types of structures
proposed for storm water systems that could be maintained by a
municipality of Scott County.
Culverts and Bridges:
Proposed channel and stream crossings are to include a means to convey the
100-year flow. Culverts are typically used in situations where drainage ways
do not have any base flows associated with them. Head conditions occur on the
upstream side to force the peak flow through the structure(s). Proposed
culverts are to be designed so that the 100-year water surface elevation is
one foot below the overtopping elevation of the embankment. Bridge structures
are to be used at creek and stream crossings where base flow conditions do
exist (base flow being defined as water being present in channel and stream
areas during dry weather conditions). These structures are to be designed to
convey the 100-year flow rate unimpeded, and allow the 100-year water surface
elevation to be one foot below the bottom of the slab. All proposed bridges
are to be certified by the designer after construction. Prior to construction
all permits are to be obtained from Corps of Engineers and/or Division of
Water, if applicable.
Other design considerations that apply to
culverts and bridges are listed in the following:
- Live load considerations for anticipated
construction traffic, fire service vehicles, refuse trucks, commercial
vehicles, etc.
- Public protection for pedestrian and bicycle
traffic, if applicable.
- Headwalls for the upstream and downstream
sides of proposed culverts. Fences or railing are to be provided for
headwall that are for 30 inch lines or greater.
- Railing design for bridges.
- End treatments for culverts to minimize
erosion and sediment transport.
- Scouring protection for bridge piers and
abutments.
- Fish passage.
- Streambank stabilization designs for
backwater areas and accelerated flows downstream.
There are areas within Scott County,
particularly in the north, where existing roadways are already in place and
lying in the floodplain. In situations where roads must be improved due to
development, any portion of the roadway that is flooded by the 100 year event
or less must be reconstructed to provide a concrete cap with a footer design
on the upstream side, to reduce the potential of a roadway being washed out.
Open Channel Design:
Developments that use open channels to convey runoff must adhere to the
following guidelines:
- Convey the 100 year event.
- Designs not to exceed the channel lining’s
critical shear force and permissible velocity in the 10 year event.
- Select the appropriate roughness values for
proposed channels.
- Provide any armoring needed for hydraulic
jump and bend conditions.
E. Storm Water Credits:
Storm water credits are water quality reductions permitted through specific
site design criteria. These credits are established to help reduce the impacts
on Scott County’s stream systems. The credits are calculated based on the
procedures outlined and subtracted from the water quality requirements for a
development. The following is a list of the stormwater credits that are
permitted for this community:
- Filter strips
- Vegetated channels
- Riparian buffers
- Terraformed Areas
- Rooftop disconnections
- Modular/porous pavements
Note: Storm water credits are set to encourage
"greener" site designs; however, they are not intended to be a
substitution for the water quality protection of the regulations. All drainage
from proposed impervious areas must be treated by a storm water BMP.
1. Filter Strips:
Filter strips are undisturbed grass areas that receive runoff from a
development in the form of sheet flow. It is important to note that the filter
area must remain undisturbed during construction to allow natural percolation
to occur.
Credit definition:
- Impervious areas draining to the filter
strip are deducted from the total impervious area used to determine the
water quality volume.
- An additional 0.075 acre-ft per acre of
filter strip is also deducted from the remainder of the water quality
volume.
Credit criteria:
- Minimum filter strip widths are 50 feet.
- Runoff draining across filter strips shall
be in the form of sheet flow only.
- The maximum contributing length draining to
filter strips shall be 150 feet for residential development and 75 feet
for commercial development. Designers are permitted to design filter
strips to treat larger areas as long as they follow the design procedure
outlined for Riparian Buffers.
- Slopes greater than 5 percent are to
incorporate a means by which runoff is dispersed into sheet flow, for
example, a level spreader or 30 feet grass buffer.
- Filter strips near channels or drainage ways
are to be set outside bankfull conditions.
- The infiltration rate for the underlying
soil must not be less than 0.25 in/hr.
- Areas draining to filter strips that include
rooftops of homes and buildings must have notes on Final Subdivision Plats
and/or Final Development Plans stating that the roof drains are to be
directed towards the filter strip areas.
- Filter strips shall be set in easements, or
in some other means for protection, on Final Subdivision Plats and/or
Final Development Plans.
2. Vegetated Channels:
Vegetated channels can be used for water quality treatment. These types of
channels apply to roadway ditches, drainage ways in the rear of lots,
conveyance systems for parking lot drainage, etc.
Credit definition:
- Impervious areas draining through vegetated
channels are deducted from the total impervious area used to determine the
water quality volume.
- An additional 0.25 acre-ft per acre of
channel area needed to convey the one inch storm event is also deducted
from the remainder of the water quality volume.
Credit criteria:
- The geometry of the channels must be either
parabolic or trapezoidal.
- Channel side slopes are not to exceed 3:1.
- The velocity of flow in the channel must be
1.0 feet per second or less for the runoff produced by the one inch storm
event.
- The 10 year/ 24 hr event is not to exceed
the tractive force or permissible velocity of the vegetative cover or the
underlying soil, whichever is greater.
- No headwalls are to be in the direct path of
the water quality discharge areas.
- The infiltration rate for the underlying
soil must not be less than 0.25 in/hr.
- Areas draining to vegetated channels that
include rooftops of homes and buildings must have notes on Final
Subdivision Plats and/or Final Development Plans stating that the roof
drains are to be directed towards the open channel areas.
- Channels shall be set in drainage easements
on Final Subdivision Plats and/or Final Development Plans, stating that
there will be no obstructions or structures permitted in the easements
including fences.
Sizing calculations: In order to satisfy Credit
criteria #3, the curve number representing an area that is intended to be
treated by a vegetated channel must be modified in order to get an accurate
peak flow rate for the 1 inch storm.
WQin = Water quality depth, in.
P = 90 percent of total storm events, 1 inch.
I = Percent impervious, %.


CN = Curve number for water quality storm
event.
References: Design of Stormwater Filtering
Systems, 1996. Center for Watershed
Protection.
3. Riparian Buffers: This credit applies to developments that incorporate riparian buffer
practices as a part of its design. The criteria are similar to filter strips
except that it is a higher credit for water quality quantity.
Credit definition:
- Impervious areas draining to the filter
strip are deducted from the total impervious area used to determine the
water quality volume.
- An additional 0.25 acre-ft per acre of
buffer is also deducted from the remainder of the water quality volume.
Credit criteria:
- Runoff draining across riparian buffers
shall be in the form of sheet flow only.
- The velocity of flow in the in the buffers
must be 1.0 feet per second or less for the runoff produced by the one
inch storm event.
- Slopes greater than 5 percent are to
incorporate a means by which runoff is dispersed into sheet flow, for
example, a level spreader or 30 feet grass buffer.
- Riparian widths are to be based on a
residence time of 9 minutes.
- Vines and shrubs are to be planted with a
minimum density of 1700 stems per acre (one planting per 25 square feet at
5 feet on center), and trees planted at 450 stems per acre (one planting
every 100 square feet at 10 feet on center).
- For diversity, six or more species from the
planting list on pages 13 to 15 must be used for each riparian design.
- Riparian buffers near channels or drainage
ways are to be set outside bankfull conditions.
- The infiltration rate for the underlying
soil must not be less than 0.25 in/hr.
- Areas draining to riparian buffers that
include rooftops of homes and buildings must have notes on Final
Subdivision Plats and/or Final Development Plans stating that the roof
drains are to be directed towards the riparian buffer areas.
- Riparian buffers shall be set in easements,
or in some other means for protection, on Final Subdivision Plats and/or
Final Development Plans.
Sizing calculations:

Q = Flow rate, cfs.
n = Manning’s roughness (0.24 for grass buffers, 0.35 for forested buffers).
A = Cross sectional area, sf.
R = Hydraulic radius, ft.
S = Channel slope, ft/ft.
T = Parallel length of buffer to bank.

y = Depth of flow (0.5 to 1.0), in.


V = Flow velocity, fps.

W = Riparian buffer width, ft.
t = Resident time (9), min.
Planting list:
Herbaceous Ground Cover
|
Common Name |
Scientific Name |
Recommended Shade/Sun |
|
River Oats |
Chasmanthium latifolia |
Shade |
|
Indian Grass |
Sorgastum nutans |
Sun |
|
Switch Grass |
Panicum virgatum |
Sun |
|
Redtop |
Agrostis alba |
Sun |
|
Deertongue |
Panicum clandestinum |
Shade |
|
Broomsedge |
Andropogon virginicus |
Sun |
|
Big Blue Stem |
Andropogon gerardii |
Sun |
|
Frank’s Sedge |
Carex |
Sun |
|
Gray’s Sedge |
Carex grayii |
Shade |
|
Soft Rush |
Juncus effusus |
Sun |
|
Flat Sedge |
Cyperus strigosus |
Sun |
|
Lady Fern |
Athyrium felix-femina |
Shade |
|
Sensitive Fern |
Onoclea sensibilis |
Shade |
|
Cinnamon Fern |
Osmunda cinnamomea |
Shade |
|
Common Boneset |
Eupatorium perfoliatum |
Sun |
|
Golden Ragwort |
Senecio aureus |
Shade |
|
Wrinkled Goldenrod |
Solidago rugosa |
Sun |
|
Tall Goldenrod |
Solidago gigantea |
Sun |
|
Beard Tongue |
Penstemon hirsutus |
Shade |
|
Monkey Flower |
Mimulus ringens |
Shade |
|
Cardinal Flower |
Lobelia cardinalis |
Shade |
|
Great Blue Lobelia |
Lobelia silphilitica |
Shade |
Vines and Shrubs
|
Common Name |
Scientific Name |
Shade/Sun |
|
Cross Vine |
Bigononia carpreolata |
Shade |
|
Trumpet Creeper |
Campsis radicans |
Sun |
|
Climbing Hydrangea |
Decumaria barbara |
Shade |
|
Giant Cane |
Arundinaria gigantea |
Sun |
|
Buttonbush |
Cephalanthus occidentalis |
Sun |
|
Meadowsweet |
Spirea alba |
Sun |
|
Sweetspire |
Itea virginica |
Shade |
|
Spicebush |
Lindera benzoin |
Shade |
|
Paw-paw |
Asimina triloba |
Shade |
|
Arrowwood |
Viburnum dentatum |
Shade |
|
Nannyberry |
Viburnum lentago |
Sun |
|
Swamp Haw |
Viburnum nudum |
Shade |
|
Ninebark |
Physocarpus opolifolius |
Sun |
|
Hazelnut |
Corylus americana |
Sun |
|
Possum Haw |
Ilex decidua |
Sun |
|
Winterberry |
Ilex verticillata |
Shade |
|
Chokeberry |
Aronia arbutifolia |
Sun |
|
Elderberry |
Sambucus candensis |
Sun |
|
Juneberry |
Amelanchier arborea |
Shade |
|
Mountain Camelia |
Stewartia ovata |
Shade |
|
Sweetbells |
Leucothe racemosa |
Shade |
|
Smooth Azalea |
Rhododendron arborescens |
Shade |
|
Silky Dogwood |
Cornus amomum |
Sun |
|
Redosier Dogwood |
Cornus stolonifera |
Shade |
|
Rough-leaf Dogwood |
Cornus drummondii |
Shade |
|
Pagoda Dogwood |
Cornus alternifolia |
Shade |
|
Smooth Alder |
Alnus serrulata |
Sun |
|
Sandbar Willow |
Salix interior |
Sun |
|
Silky Willow |
Salix sericea |
Sun |
|
Dwarf Willow |
Salix humilis var. macrophylla |
Sun |
|
Pussy Willow |
Salix discolor |
Sun |
|
Streamco Willow |
Salix purpurea |
Sun |
|
Bankers Willow |
Salix x cotteti |
Sun |
|
Heart-leaf Willow |
Salix rigida |
Sun |
Trees
|
Common Name |
Scientific Name |
Height
Ft |
Spread
Ft |
|
Black Willow |
Salix nigra |
60-100 |
50-85 |
|
Boxelder |
Acer negundo |
30-60 |
25-50 |
|
Red Maple |
Acer rubrum |
50-100 |
20-40 |
|
Silver Maple |
Acer saccharinum |
50-80 |
35-50 |
|
Green Ash |
Fraxinus pennsylvanica |
50-60 |
30-40 |
|
White Ash |
Fraxinus americana |
80 |
65 |
|
Red Elm |
Ulmus rubra |
70 |
55 |
|
Silverbell |
Halesia carolina |
30-40 |
20-35 |
|
Persimmon |
Diospryros virginiana |
20-70 |
10-40 |
|
River Birch |
Betula nigra |
40-70 |
30-60 |
|
Black Gum |
Nyssa sylvatica |
30-90 |
20-30 |
|
Hackberry |
Celtis occidentalis |
40-70 |
40-50 |
|
Cottonwood |
Populus deltoides |
75-100 |
50-75 |
|
Sweet Gum |
Liquidambar styraciflua |
50-75 |
40-50 |
|
Tulip Polar |
Liriodendron tulipifera |
60-90 |
30-50 |
|
Sycamore |
Plantanus occidentalis |
75-100 |
50-75 |
|
American Beech |
Fagus grandiflora |
50-90 |
40-75 |
|
Ironwood |
Carpinus caroliniana |
30 |
30 |
|
Yellow Buckeye |
Aesculus octandra |
70-90 |
40-55 |
|
Shellbark Hickory |
Carya lacinosa |
70-100 |
50-75 |
|
Shaqbark Hickory |
Carya ovata |
70-100 |
45-65 |
|
Pecan |
Carya illinoensis |
100 |
70 |
|
Black Walnut |
Juglans nigra |
70-90 |
45-60 |
|
Bur Oak |
Quercus macrocarpa |
70-100 |
75-90 |
|
Pin Oak |
Quercus palustris |
50-90 |
25-45 |
|
Swamp Oak |
Quercus bicolor |
60-70 |
30-35 |
|
Swamp Chestnut Oak |
Quercus michauxii |
60-80 |
40-55 |
References: Riparian Buffers Strategies for
Urban Watersheds, 1995.
LFUCG Stormwater Manual, 1999.
4. Terraformed Areas: Terraformed areas are places within a development that have been graded
to promote stormwater infiltration, such as terracing and berming. Runoff is
retained within a bermed area and allowed to percolate into the soil. Bermed
swales, storage areas, and side-saddle impoundment areas are examples of this
stormwater practice.
Credit definition:
- The runoff volume, impounded by terraformed
areas, is deducted from the groundwater recharge and water quality
volumes.
- An additional 0.25 acre-ft per acre of
terraformed area is also deducted from the remainder of the water quality
volume.
Credit criteria:
- Slopes greater than 5 percent are to
incorporate a means by which runoff is dispersed into sheet flow, for
example, a level spreader or 30 feet grass buffer.
- Terraformed areas near channels or drainage
ways are to be set outside the 10 year water surface elevation areas.
- The infiltration rate for the underlying
soil must not be less than 0.25 in/hr.
- Areas draining to terraformed areas that
include rooftops of homes and buildings must have notes on Final
Subdivision Plats and/or Final Development Plans stating that the roof
drains are to be directed towards the terraformed areas.
- Terraformed areas must drain within 48
hours.
- Terraformed areas shall be set in easements,
or in some other means for protection, on Final Subdivision Plats and/or
Final Development Plans.
5. Rooftop Disconnections: Downspouts from homes for single family detached developments including
duplexes that do not tie into a storm sewer, or drain directly to impervious
areas, will have a credit towards the water quality calculations.
Credit definition:
- Rooftop areas draining directly across yard
areas are deducted from the total impervious area used to determine the
water quality volume.
- The maximum credit may not exceed roof areas
of typical homes for proposed residential developments.
Credit criteria:
- Yard areas receiving rooftop runoff are to
be at least ⅓ of the roof areas.
- Discharges must at least travel across 30
feet of grass areas before reaching any impervious surfaces.
- This credit cannot be counted if the design
for the proposed development already takes into account a BMP treatment
for drainage areas that include proposed homes.
- Rooftops draining onto yard areas must have
notes on Final Subdivision Plats and/or Final Development Plans stating
that the roof drains are to be directed towards the yard areas.
6. Modular/Porous
Pavements: Modular/porous
pavement designs can be used for developments to promote infiltration of
runoff. The performance of these pavements will depend on the application for
which they are used, the construction parameters, and the manufacture’s
specifications. These designs are permitted in commercial and industrial
areas, only upon the review and approval by the Planning Commission.
Credit definition:
- Areas using modular/porous pavements will be
treated as pervious areas for the purposes of calculating groundwater
recharge, water quality, and peak flow rates.
Credit criteria:
- Installation is to be based on the
manufacture’s specifications.
- Porosity of the fill material is based on
what the designer specifies as material to be used.
- Modular/porous pavements are limited to
seasonal sale areas, overflow parking locations, and 25% of the total
minimal required parking as part of the Development Plan process.
- Proposed modular/porous pavement areas are
to be installed after the contributing drainage area is fully constructed,
to prevent clogging of the voids.
- Subgrade compaction is to be evaluated and
specifications provided to allow the modular/porous pavements to function
as designed.
SECTION TWO: EFFECTIVE
DATE: This Ordinance shall
take effect upon passage and publication.
The foregoing Ordinance was introduced and read
for the first time at the Council’s regular meeting September 19, 2002, and
for the second time, adopted and approved, at the Council’s regular meeting
October 3, 2002.
APPROVED BY:
_______________________________
EVERETTE VARNEY, MAYOR
ATTESTED BY:
________________________________
GLENWOOD C. WILLIAMS, CLERK
|